<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!--Generated by Squarespace Site Server v5.9.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/) on Thu, 11 Mar 2010 06:06:41 GMT--><rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:rss="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:cc="http://web.resource.org/cc/"><rss:channel rdf:about="http://www.dailyheadspa.com/dailyheadspa-blog/"><rss:title>daily headspa blog</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.dailyheadspa.com/dailyheadspa-blog/</rss:link><rss:description></rss:description><dc:language>en-AU</dc:language><dc:date>2010-03-11T06:06:41Z</dc:date><admin:generatorAgent rdf:resource="http://www.squarespace.com/">Squarespace Site Server v5.9.2 (http://www.squarespace.com/)</admin:generatorAgent><rss:items><rdf:Seq><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.dailyheadspa.com/dailyheadspa-blog/2010/3/10/ill-have-mine-neat.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.dailyheadspa.com/dailyheadspa-blog/2010/3/9/neat-and.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.dailyheadspa.com/dailyheadspa-blog/2010/3/8/how-neat-is-too-neat.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.dailyheadspa.com/dailyheadspa-blog/2010/3/7/good-news.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.dailyheadspa.com/dailyheadspa-blog/2010/3/6/a-brief-reading.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.dailyheadspa.com/dailyheadspa-blog/2010/3/5/id-rather-be-reading.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.dailyheadspa.com/dailyheadspa-blog/2010/3/4/getting-it-down.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.dailyheadspa.com/dailyheadspa-blog/2010/3/3/the-novelty-effect.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.dailyheadspa.com/dailyheadspa-blog/2010/3/2/the-novel-novel.html"/><rdf:li rdf:resource="http://www.dailyheadspa.com/dailyheadspa-blog/2010/3/1/a-room-of-ones-own.html"/></rdf:Seq></rss:items></rss:channel><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.dailyheadspa.com/dailyheadspa-blog/2010/3/10/ill-have-mine-neat.html"><rss:title>I'll have mine neat</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.dailyheadspa.com/dailyheadspa-blog/2010/3/10/ill-have-mine-neat.html</rss:link><dc:creator>dailyheadspa</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-03-10T07:42:04Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Neat Neat Wednesdays</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That's what Sean Connery should have been saying as James Bond instead of "shaken not stirred." (see video clip below for Sean's rendition of "007 cocktail 101")</p>
<p>But maybe he wouldn't have. It's a big debate in his homeland and amongst all of us wanna be Scots elsewhere - whether or not to put a little water in your whisky. Proponents of water in the whisky, such as John from New Zealand behind the bar on a tiny little Scottish island...how do these small islanders find each other...say it opens up the flavours. Naysayers will tell you it masks them and call themselves purists. People who put ice in their whisky just don't count. As human beings.</p>
<p>Chemists have been studying this (on their breaks from creating the next biofuel that will save us all) and they conclude that</p>
<blockquote>
<p>If you increase the water content, you reduce the solubility of some long-chain compounds - such as esters. You also increase the volatility of some compounds, especially hydrophobic ones. While phenols, for example - the smoky compounds - are particularly water-soluble, so you'd expect to reduce the volatility of those as you dilute. Nitrogen-containing compounds too - they're the roasted nut and cereal flavours - would be reduced.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I might have had too much whisky...what? In sum, "So if you like the cereal tones or that smoked peaty aroma, drink your  malt whisky neat."</p>
<p>However, before you start waving that in someone's face as she reaches for the quaint water jug designed <span class="full-image-float-right ssNonEditable"><span><a href="http://whiskyglass.ca/index.php?main_page=product_info&amp;cPath=1&amp;products_id=29"><img src="http://www.dailyheadspa.com/storage/Iona jug.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1268207977372" alt="" /></a></span></span>especially for this purpose...</p>
<blockquote>
<p>When you add water to one it tastes much better, but add water to another and it might taste far worse. For example, heavier whiskies that have strong sulfur notes -those compounds are released when you dilute the whisky, and most people find them unpleasant.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Here's a link to the whole article in <a href="http://www.rsc.org/chemistryworld/Issues/2008/December/AWhiskyTour.asp">"Chemistry World,"</a> including some information about why I've been too harsh to those who put ice in their whisky. Who knew?</p>
<p>Like most good, long-standing clannish fueds it remains entirely up to one's personal taste and family tartan tradition as to whether you add water or not. Alternatively, you could just try to decide which will make you look sexier when ordering a drink. Which leads us back to Bond. Throw it all out and go for the martini? Here's that clip I promised to help you decide.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/OUUq5mRCimo&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/OUUq5mRCimo&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.dailyheadspa.com/dailyheadspa-blog/2010/3/9/neat-and.html"><rss:title>neat and...</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.dailyheadspa.com/dailyheadspa-blog/2010/3/9/neat-and.html</rss:link><dc:creator>dailyheadspa</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-03-09T07:14:00Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Neat Neat Tuesdays</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, so is it "neat and clean" or "neat and tidy?"</p>
<p>Imagine that you are learning English as a second language. Imagine that you are writing to an English language forum with this burning question. Here's the answer -</p>
<blockquote>
<p>"Neat and tidy","clean and tidy", and "neat and clean" all mean the basically same thing to me. The main difference was that one isn't a typical collocation. I suppose "neat and clean" could be applied to a person whereas the expressions with "tidy" tend to indicate a place.<br /><br />response to a question posted by Van Kahn writing from Ho Chi Minh city on <a href="http://www.english-test.net/forum/ftopic10998.html">englishtest.net</a></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Got it? Neat and clean = person. Neat and tidy = place. Here are some additional video resources to help you keep this important distinction in mind (wouldn't want to be sloppy with your neatness references, would ya), whether English is your first or 51st language.</p>
<p>Neat and Clean</p>
<p><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/QRB3xDg5pnU&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/QRB3xDg5pnU&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></p>
<p>Neat and Tidy</p>
<p><object width="480" height="385"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/ogTAIuMXbYY&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/ogTAIuMXbYY&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="480" height="385"></embed></object></p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.dailyheadspa.com/dailyheadspa-blog/2010/3/8/how-neat-is-too-neat.html"><rss:title>how neat is too neat?</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.dailyheadspa.com/dailyheadspa-blog/2010/3/8/how-neat-is-too-neat.html</rss:link><dc:creator>dailyheadspa</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-03-08T07:59:02Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Mondays Neat Neat</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I admit it. I'm a bit of a neat freak. Apparently, this is not good news. Sigh. Another virtue deconstructed...</p>
<p>According to<a href="http://www.smh.com.au/news/opinion/just-perfect-when-its-neat-and-tidy-and-thats-the-problem/2007/11/02/1193619142378.html"> a study</a> by Eric Abrahamson, professor of management at Columbia Business School, and writer David Freedman,</p>
<blockquote>
<p>moderately disorganised people, institutions, and systems frequently turn out to be more efficient, resilient, more creative, and generally more effective than highly organised ones</p>
</blockquote>
<p>This is truly news to me. But here's the real shocker -</p>
<p>These two authors surveyed real office workers and found that</p>
<blockquote>
<p>people with very neat desks spent 36 per cent more time on organising and searching than people with fairly messy ones. This is probably because an apparently messy desk reflects some intuitive organising principle inside its user's mind.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Great. There goes all scientific justification for the time I spend keeping my desk neat. But what if my intuitive organizing principle is manifested in the act of tidying my desk. What then, huh, huh?</p>
<p>Why can't I be both virtuous (as in, neat) and intuitive. Didn't think of that one, did they? I should stop before this gets messy...</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.dailyheadspa.com/dailyheadspa-blog/2010/3/7/good-news.html"><rss:title>Good news</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.dailyheadspa.com/dailyheadspa-blog/2010/3/7/good-news.html</rss:link><dc:creator>dailyheadspa</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-03-07T07:52:22Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Novel Novel Sundays</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>New and improved. Bring it on! It&rsquo;s what we live for. Surely everything can be improved right? And everything improved is new again! <br /><br />We want it always new and improved. We expect it, we demand it! In fact we seem so addicted to the idea that we will buy something that really can&rsquo;t be improved that much something that we know can&rsquo;t be improved that much, (peanut butter for example; you crush some peanuts and put them in a jar...), just because it has a new and improved sticker on it...<br /><br />We&rsquo;d be wrong, I think, to imagine that the addiction to novelty was itself novel. Or that its always a bad thing. <br /><br />Take Jesus. Wasn&rsquo;t his message a new and improved version of historic Judaism?<br />&ldquo;Neither do men pour new wine into old wineskins. If they do, the skins will burst, the wine will run out and the wineskins will be ruined. No, they pour new wine into new wineskins, and both are preserved." Matthew 9:17<br />Or this lovely poem from Rumi:</p>
<p><strong>The New Rule</strong><br />It's the old rule that drunks have to argue <br />and get into fights. <br />The lover is just as bad. he falls into a hole. <br />But down in that hole he finds something shining, <br />worth more than any amount of money or power. <br />Last night the moon came dropping its clothes in the street. <br />I took it as a sign to start singing,<br />falling up into the bowl of sky. <br />The bowl breaks. Everywhere is falling everywhere. <br />Nothing else to do. <br />Here's the new rule: break the wineglass, <br />and fall toward the glassblower's breath.<br /><br />Inside this new love, die. <br />Your way begins on the other side. <br />Become the sky. <br />Take an axe to the prison wall. <br />Escape. <br />Walk out like someone suddenly born into color. <br />Do it now. <br />Your covered with thick cloud. <br />Slide out the side. <br />Die, and be quiet. Quietness is the surest sign <br />that you've died. <br />Your old life was a frantic running <br />from silence. <br />The speechless full moon comes out now. <br />"I used to want buyers for my words. <br />Now I wish someone would buy me away from words.<br /><br />I've made a lot of charmingly profound images, <br />scenes with Abraham, and Abraham's father, Azar, <br />who was also famous for icons.<br /><br />I'm so tired of what I've been doing.<br /><br />Then one image without form came, <br />and I quit.<br /><br />Look for someone else to tend the shop. <br />I'm out of the image-making business.<br /><br />Finally I know the freedom <br />of madness.<br /><br />A random image arrives. I scream, <br />"Get out!" It disintegrates.<br /><br />Only love. <br />Only the holder the flag fits into, <br />and wind. No flag. "<br /><br />Rumi﻿</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.dailyheadspa.com/dailyheadspa-blog/2010/3/6/a-brief-reading.html"><rss:title>A brief reading</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.dailyheadspa.com/dailyheadspa-blog/2010/3/6/a-brief-reading.html</rss:link><dc:creator>dailyheadspa</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-03-06T10:59:59Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Novel Novel Saturdays</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Want to be well read but no time to read? This is the <a href="http://www.rinkworks.com/bookaminute/">website</a> for you.</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.dailyheadspa.com/dailyheadspa-blog/2010/3/5/id-rather-be-reading.html"><rss:title>I'd rather be reading</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.dailyheadspa.com/dailyheadspa-blog/2010/3/5/id-rather-be-reading.html</rss:link><dc:creator>dailyheadspa</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-03-05T08:05:55Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Fridays Novel Novel</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If Jane&rsquo;s quote doesn&rsquo;t make any sense to you, then this is not your post; don&rsquo;t bother reading any more. <br /><br />To be honest, I&rsquo;ve never understood people for whom, &lsquo;I&rsquo;d rather be reading&rsquo; (the slogan for the UN&rsquo;s International Literacy Year in 1990) is not a mantra. When sitting on a train reading I sometimes look up at people who are just sitting and wonder what they might be thinking. In these situations I find myself alternating between horror that they are wasting precious reading time and envy that they seem to be so at home with themselves that they enjoy being at home with themselves. But I soon bury myself back in my book and try not to let the thoughts disturb me too much...<br /><br />With the advent of the printing press and the availability of comparatively cheap books, there was a lively debate as to what would happen to the young once exposed to books for hours every day. <br /><br />One view had it that their minds would go to mush because they would not longer be stretched to memorize; they would become lazy and indolent with everything laid out before them between the covers. Our youth will, some thought, spend hours by themselves staring at the printed page rather than being outside interacting with others and the natural world. They will forget how to be human...<br /><br />Anyway, enough of dusty old arguments that have no relevance whatsoever to our current situations.<br /><br />Four ways to know if you are a compulsive reader:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><br />One - you keep lists of books you want to read - mine is, and I&rsquo;ve just given it a rough count, more than 300 books long. Some of them have waited patiently on the list for more than a decade.<br /><br />Two - you have at least one book under the front seat of your car or in the bag you usually have with you, just in case you forget one of your current books and are caught somewhere with a spare moment.<br /><br />Three - the only way to pass a second hand book store without going in is to speak to yourself quite sternly for the time it takes to leave the shop behind you.<br /><br />Four - You have at least four and more likely 8 books on the go at any one time, covering a variety of topics and styles so that you always have a book that suits your reading mood.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><br />If this is you, my advice would be, don&rsquo;t fight it, abandon yourself to your fate and start another book and remember, that the current figures say that at least 1,000 new books are published every day, so get reading already!<br />﻿</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.dailyheadspa.com/dailyheadspa-blog/2010/3/4/getting-it-down.html"><rss:title>Getting it down</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.dailyheadspa.com/dailyheadspa-blog/2010/3/4/getting-it-down.html</rss:link><dc:creator>dailyheadspa</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-03-04T05:44:34Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Novel Novel Thursdays</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&rsquo;t remember who said that writing is all about writing words on paper but as an explanation of the writing task it is hard to beat.<br /><br />Here are the writing habits of a few people who manage to get words to paper in a regular and interesting fashion:<br /><br />Ruth Rendell has averaged about two novels every year for most of her career. Her routine is to write every morning for five&nbsp;hours, and then she always eats the exact same lunch: bread, cheese, salad, and fruit. She also likes to move a lot. Since her&nbsp;writing career began, she's lived in 18 different houses, entirely by choice. <br /><br />Graham Greene realized early in his writing career that if he wrote just 500 words a day, he would have <br />written several million words in just a few decades. So he developed a routine of writing for exactly two <br />hours every day, and he was so strict about stopping after exactly two hours that he often stopped writing <br />in the middle of a sentence. And at that pace, he managed to publish 26 novels, as well as numerous short <br />stories, plays, screenplays, memoirs, and travel books. <br /><br />Paul Rudnick, a regular contributor to&nbsp;The New Yorker, has said: "As a writer, I need an enormous amount of time alone. Writing is 90 percent procrastination: reading magazines, eating cereal out of the box, watching infomercials. It's a matter of doing everything you can to avoid writing, until it is about four in the morning and you reach the point where you have to write. Having anybody watching that or attempting to share it with me would be grisly." <br /><br />So, writers, go ye forth and, well, write something down!﻿</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.dailyheadspa.com/dailyheadspa-blog/2010/3/3/the-novelty-effect.html"><rss:title>The novelty effect</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.dailyheadspa.com/dailyheadspa-blog/2010/3/3/the-novelty-effect.html</rss:link><dc:creator>dailyheadspa</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-03-03T07:20:46Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Novel Novel Wednesdays</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get excited when you gent some new piece of gadgetry? You are not alone and it seems that it might be good for your performance too. This from Wikipedia:</p>
<blockquote>
<p><br />The novelty effect, in the context of Human Performance, is the tendency for performance to initially improve when new technology is instituted, not because of any actual improvement in learning or achievement, but in response to increased interest in the new technology. The Metropolitan Education and Research Consortium (MERC) of the Virginia Commonwealth University states, "While it is possible that higher attention spans can be attributed to novelty effect, even after the initial novelty wears off, the level of interest in the automated workbook is still greater than that in the regular workbook. The increased attention by students sometimes results in increased effort or persistence, which yields achievement gains. If they are due to a novelty effect, these gains tend to diminish as students become more familiar with the new medium. This was the case in reviews of computer-assisted instruction at the secondary school level, grades 6 to 12 (Clark &amp; Sugrue, 1988)."<br />The novelty effect, in context of psychology, is the tendency for an individual to have the strongest stress response the first time that individual is faced with a potentially threatening experience. Over time, as the novelty wears off, the stress response decreases.﻿</p>
</blockquote>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.dailyheadspa.com/dailyheadspa-blog/2010/3/2/the-novel-novel.html"><rss:title>The novel novel</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.dailyheadspa.com/dailyheadspa-blog/2010/3/2/the-novel-novel.html</rss:link><dc:creator>dailyheadspa</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-03-02T06:16:20Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Novel Novel Tuesdays</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here are two definitions of the word novel:<br /><br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; An extended fictional work in prose; usually in the form of a story<br /><br />&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Something fresh: original and of a kind not seen before.<br /><br />Not all that is novel arrives in the form of the novel and not all novels are novel.<br /><br />The first novel was, by definition novel.<br /><br />The consensus on the first and therefore novel novel is that is was written in the eleventh century, in Japan by an unknown woman whom scholars have called Murasaki Shikibu after the novel&rsquo;s main character. Called, &lsquo;<a href="http://www.taleofgenji.org/">The Tale of Genji</a>&rsquo; it runs, in its English translation, to over 1,000 pages and is set in the Japanese imperial court in what is now Kyoto. The story follows Genji, the son of the emperor and what happens to him when he loses his place at the court and becomes a commoner. Surely one of the world&rsquo;s classic tales.<br /><br />Go <a href="http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/014243714X/thetaleofgenj-20">here</a> to see the Amazon site for the book and you can read the first few pages and see if it hooks you.<br />﻿</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item><rss:item rdf:about="http://www.dailyheadspa.com/dailyheadspa-blog/2010/3/1/a-room-of-ones-own.html"><rss:title>A room of one’s own</rss:title><rss:link>http://www.dailyheadspa.com/dailyheadspa-blog/2010/3/1/a-room-of-ones-own.html</rss:link><dc:creator>dailyheadspa</dc:creator><dc:date>2010-03-01T06:17:52Z</dc:date><dc:subject>Mondays Novel Novel</dc:subject><content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This week we play with novel. <br /><br />Today is St David&rsquo;s day, the national day for Wales, my home country. It&rsquo;s not much of a novel idea; St David lived in the sixth century, the great age of the Celtic saints and he&rsquo;s been the patron saint of Wales for at least a millennia. And, as us Welsh are never tired of pointing out, Dewi Sant (that&rsquo;s Welsh for all you poor unfortunate souls who have never heard the language of heaven) is the only one of the British patron saints to have been born and bread in the land for which he is the patron.<br /><br />Since it is our national day, it&rsquo;s a great day to remember Dylan Thomas, perhaps the patron saint of modern Welsh poetry. Yes he wasn&rsquo;t a novelist but, as William Faulkner once famously said, &lsquo;'I&rsquo;m a failed poet. Maybe every novelist wants to write poetry first, finds he can't and then tries the short story which is the most demanding form after poetry. And failing at that, only then does he take up novel writing.&rdquo;<br /><br />So, on Dewi Sant&rsquo;s Day, with just the most tenuous link to the idea of novel, here&rsquo;s a photo of where Dylan loved to write, his Boat Shed on the banks of the Taf in Laugharne, South Wales. And here&rsquo;s a poem written following my pilgrimage there more than a decade ago. ﻿</p>
<p><span class="full-image-block ssNonEditable"><span><img src="http://www.dailyheadspa.com/storage/Dylan_Thomas's_Boat_House_Laugharne_-_geograph.org.uk_-_13737.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1267424828658" alt="" /></span></span></p>
<p><strong>The Day I Went to Look for Dylan Thomas</strong></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>It was freezing cold</p>
<p>and the sun was shinning</p>
<p>the day I went to look</p>
<p>for Dylan Thomas</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The Taf estuary sang</p>
<p>silent as a chapel</p>
<p>on a Monday morning</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The robins and the</p>
<p>gulls and the herons</p>
<p>watched the Boat House</p>
<p>where I wandered&nbsp; to the</p>
<p>sound of the ebbing tide</p>
<p>sucking at the sand</p>
<p>and the loud voices of two</p>
<p>Cardiff girls planning Christmas</p>
<p>dinner and drinking coffee</p>
<p>with the postman</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The Writing Shed nested</p>
<p>on the cliff defying</p>
<p>anyone standing there</p>
<p>who had eyes or ears</p>
<p>or nose to not be a poet</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>I walked to the Browns</p>
<p>where he loved to drink</p>
<p>for a half of Buckleys</p>
<p>and a piece of history</p>
<p>there were just two small</p>
<p>photographs of he and Catlin</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The bar was filled with</p>
<p>young Welshmen all built like</p>
<p>rugby playing bankers gone</p>
<p>to seed they were listening to</p>
<p>Bruce Springsteen sing about</p>
<p>New Jersey and they were</p>
<p>drinking Fosters beer</p>
<p>and they didn't know of</p>
<p>Sir John's Hill of the hawk</p>
<p>on fire of the hunchback</p>
<p>in the park and they did not</p>
<p>give a toss for Captain Cat</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>But they liked a drink</p>]]></content:encoded></rss:item></rdf:RDF>